Should Zoos Exist?
Imagine you are a proud lion, with golden fur and a luxurious
mane. Imagine what it would be like to spend the rest of your life, in a small
cage, just for the entertainment of humans. It’s sad, isn’t it? Zoos are made
for the general human population be able to see the wild animals that they’ve
heard of, but is it right to keep them in cages like that? It isn’t right. As I
said earlier, keeping wild animals in cages is wrong. By doing so, we have
taken away their freedom, and we’ve put them into a small space, which is much
smaller in comparison to its own natural habitat. We are taking them away from
their homes. We are also ripping these animals away from their families. How
would you feel if you were having dinner with your parents, when suddenly, you
are taken away from them and put into a small cage? Another reason is that
animals kept in captivity lose their natural instincts/aren’t able to follow
their natural instincts. It can affect them greatly in a psychological way;
some might even become psychotic and maybe attack humans, which would give the
public a bad image of animals. Also, zoos “claim” to be saving endangered
species by keeping them “safe” in zoos, but that’s not true. Of course, the
animals are safer in captivity than in the wild without poachers.

But, if more and more endangered species are
put into zoos, there would be less in the wild. Inbreeding can happen, causing
the endangered species to become infertile, or suffer from inbreeding
depression (they are not as physically fit as their parents). They are no
longer genetically diverse, so that if the animals were ever released back into the wild, they wouldn’t be able to
breed; it upsets the natural balance of nature, and pushes the species even
closer to extinction. In conclusion, those are the reasons why I think animals
should not be kept in zoos. They are better off in sanctuaries, where they
still maintain their freedom and get to be released back into the wild, or in
national parks.
No comments:
Post a Comment